OCCUPIED JERUSALEM (AFP)
Israeli authorities were on Thursday considering demolishing the home of a Palestinian man who went on a rampage in a bulldozer in Jerusalem and killed three people before he was shot dead.
While a military inquiry found the practice to be ineffectual in the past, much of the political establishment has come out in favor of tearing down the house of any Jerusalem Palestinian who conducts attacks in Israel.
"Following a request by the government, Attorney General Menahem Mazuz will look today into the legal problems that might be involved in demolishing the houses in east Jerusalem," justice spokesman Moshe Cohen told AFP.
Israel law distinguishes between Arab east Jerusalem, which it annexed after occupying it in the 1967 Middle East war, and the rest of the West Bank, which remains under military rule.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert raised the issue just hours after a Palestinian from east Jerusalem used a bulldozer to smash into vehicles on a deadly rampage in the heart of the city on Wednesday.
"The prime minister held consultations last night with the relevant government bodies and the military in the wake of the attack," Olmert's spokesman Mark Regev told AFP.
"They discussed different means of action" including revoking residency permits, scrapping social welfare benefits and house demolitions.
Olmert insisted that Israel would not hesitate, if need be, "to resort to dissuasive means or destroy houses," according to the Yediot Aharonot daily.
A senior official in the welfare ministry confirmed to AFP that the government would cut off all social benefits to the family of the attacker.
"Wednesday's terrorist may have chosen not to carry out his attack if he had known his family could be punished for the act," President Shimon Peres told public radio.
During the Palestinian uprising of the early 2000s Israel systematically destroyed the homes of Palestinians involved in deadly attacks but the practice stopped in 2005 after then military chief of staff Lieutenant General Moshe Yaalon said in a report it was ineffective as a deterrent. |
 |
"Act of terrorism" vs "spontaneous act" Authorities called Wednesday's deadly rampage "an act of terrorism" but Police Commissioner Dudi Cohen said it appeared to be a "spontaneous incident" carried out by a father of two with a criminal past but no known links to armed groups.
A worker at a nearby construction site, the man drove an earthmover down a busy avenue ramming a bus, overturning another and ploughing into several more vehicles before police shot him dead at point-blank range.
Police questioned relatives and other residents of the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Sur Baher where the attacker, identified as Hossam Dwayyat, 30, lived.
Tearful relatives and neighbors who gathered at his house after the attack expressed shock at the incident, insisting he was an ordinary person who, like most of them, worked in mostly Jewish west Jerusalem to support his family.
Some neighbors said however that a previous marriage to an Israeli Jewish woman had ended badly and that Dwayyat had served time in jail.
Israel's Ynet news service said Dwayyat had spent two years in prison after being convicted of raping an Israeli woman with whom he had been romantically involved, but police did not immediately confirm the report.
A little-known group calling itself the Imad Mughniyah unit of the Brigades of the Liberators of the Galilee claimed responsibility in a phone call to AFP. The credibility of the claim could not immediately be established. |
