Last Update: Thu Mar 17, 2011 03:42 pm (KSA) 12:42 pm (GMT)

Afghanistan troop surge to counter Taliban: US

US soldiers watch Obama on TV at the Bagram Air Field, 50 kms north of Kabul

US soldiers watch Obama on TV at the Bagram Air Field, 50 kms north of Kabul

President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he is ordering 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan by next summer to counter a resurgent Taliban and plans to begin a troop withdrawal in 18 months.

The goal, Obama said in a prime-time televised address, is to speed the battle against Taliban insurgents, secure key population centers and train Afghan security forces so they can take over and clear the way for a U.S. exit.

"As commander-in-chief, I have determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home," Obama said.

 As commander-in-chief, I have determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home 
U.S. President Barack Obama

His exit strategy appeared to be an attempt not only to sell his shift in strategy to war-weary Americans but also to put pressure on Afghan
President Hamid Karzai to fight corruption in his government.

Under his 2011 timeframe, U.S. troops would begin returning home before Obama's expected re-election bid in 2012.

The Afghan government welcomed Obama's new strategy. Kabul has long called for the deployment of more than the 113,000 NATO and U.S. troops currently in Afghanistan to crush an insurgency at its deadliest and most widespread since U.S.-led troops ousted the Taliban regime in 2001.

US security at stake

 I do not make this decision lightly. I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan 
President Obama

In a 34-minute address, Obama recalled the spirit of unity among Americans after the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States by al-Qaeda in 2001 and warned that the militants were plotting fresh attacks.

"I do not make this decision lightly. I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan," he told cadets at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York.

Republicans zeroed in on Obama's vow that some troops will start coming home in 2011, saying it sent the wrong signal.

"A withdrawal date only emboldens al-Qaeda and the Taliban, while dispiriting our Afghan partners and making it less likely that they will risk their lives to take our side in this fight," Senator John McCain, the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, told Reuters.

Obama defended his decision and promised any pullout would be done responsibly.

Obama briefed Karzai by secure video hookup on Monday night to outline the plan. In his speech and a White House statement, he made clear Karzai is expected to take on corruption and has 18 to 24 months to make progress.

"This effort must be based on performance. The days of providing a blank check are over," Obama said.

More NATO troops

U.S. troops will begin returning home before Obama's expected re-election bid in 2012
U.S. troops will begin returning home before Obama's expected re-election bid in 2012

Major U.S. troop movements from the new deployment are likely to begin in January and all 30,000 troops should be in place by the end of August, defense officials said.

The vanguard of the U.S. buildup is expected to be the swift deployment of 9,000 Marines into some of the most dangerous parts of the country -- Taliban strongholds in southern Afghanistan, including Kandahar and Helmand.

The head of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said after Obama's speech that he expected "at least 5,000 more forces from other countries in our alliance and possibly a few thousand more."

Obama sought to reassure NATO allies he was not abandoning the war effort, while insisting they need to do their part.

"For what's at stake is not simply a test of NATO's credibility," he said. "What's at stake is the security of our allies and the common security of the world."

Beyond the United States, members of the alliance now have about 42,000 soldiers in Afghanistan.

Canada, which has more than 2,800 soldiers on the ground, welcomed Obama's decision, with Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon saying the "additional U.S. resources will help to provide a more secure environment for the Afghan people."

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Obama's speech was "courageous, determined and lucid, giving new impetus to the international commitment" but he did not immediately commit to adding to France's nearly 3,100 troops now in the war zone.

Resources to complete the task

 What's at stake is the security of our allies and the common security of the world 
President Obama

The new U.S. deployment fell short of the recommendation for 40,000 troops made in August by U.S. Army General Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan.

McChrystal said after Tuesday's speech that Obama's decision "has provided me with a clear military mission and the resources to accomplish our task."

Obama's plan also attempted to satisfy concerns on both sides of the U.S. political divide and represented a middle ground between conflicting options advocated by some of his senior advisers.

Sending more troops addresses demands from his generals and Republicans, while stressing that the U.S. commitment is not open-ended is an attempt to placate anti-war Democrats.

The cost of the troop increase, estimated at $30 billion for fiscal 2010, could set off a battle in Congress, with some Democrats calling for a temporary war surtax to pay for it.

Obama also focused on Pakistan in his speech, saying a cancer had taken root in its border region with Afghanistan and promised U.S. help to end it.

The pledge comes as Pakistan's civilian government is teetering. Some officials in Islamabad fear the U.S. surge in Afghanistan will further destabilize their country.

Comments »

Post Your Comment »