Senator Barack Obama, however, is seen differently. Because of the religious background of his father and stepfather, he is seen as a candidate who understands and empathises with Muslimseven while willing to militarily take on Osama Ben Laden and his ilk with or without the OK of a US ally in Pakistan.
Obama’s multilateralism is very refreshing. His call for talking with one’s enemies rather than boycotting them gives genuine priority to diplomacy over war, truly leaving the latter as a last resort. Ironically, the Obama campaign has avoided to apply its own concept to the issue of talking to the Islamic Hamas movement in Palestine. The argument that Hamas is a movement and not a state doesn’t hold water, considering that Palestinians have been yearning for a state for decades and pro-Hamas leaders were elected in a free and fair elections.
If Obama had been running for president a decade ago, he surely would not have made that justification regarding talking to Mandela and the ANC (that wasn’t a state either).
Obama’s supporters note that although he has refused to talk directly to Hamas, it is clear that his willingness to talk to the Syrian and Iranian leaders would provide a group like Hamas (whose leaders are supported by these countries) an opportunity to be heard, albeit, indirectly. By agreeing to talk to these countries, Obama will be indirectly connecting with the Hamas leaders.
More specifically on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the Obama campaign has been very clear on supporting the two-state solution, but has been vague on how to reach that.
Ironically, Obama was the most forthcoming when speaking to 100 members of Cleveland’s Jewish Community, transcripts of which were published in the NY Sun on February 25, 2008.
“This is where I get to be honest and I hope I’m not out of school here. I think there is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, you’re anti-Israel and that can’t be the measure of our friendship with Israel,” he said.
Obama listed his overall plans by stating: “My goal then would be to solicit as many practical opinions as possible in terms of how we’re going to move forward on the improvement of [Palestinian-Israeli] relations and a sustainable peace.”
The mixed-race American candidate also said that he had consistently urged the Palestinians, when he was in Ramallah, to “relinquish the right of return as it has been understood in the past. And that doesn’t mean that there may not be conversations about compensation issues”.
“One of the things that struck me when I went to Israel was how much more open the debate was around these issues in Israel than they are sometimes here in the United States. It’s very ironic,” he said.
Referring to the best way to reach peace, Obama said: “I want practical, hardheaded, unromantic advice about how we’re going to achieve that.”
Unfortunately, however, and in response to the statements of his pastor, which included criticism of US support of Israeli “state sponsored terrorism against Palestinians”, Obama discounted all the national struggles of Palestinians (that includes secular Palestinians, moderate Muslim and Christian Palestinians) by attacking Pastor Wright’s sermon as “a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam”.
Nevertheless, the Obama candidacy is for some a source of optimism. Many Palestinians believe that if diplomacy will trump the military in resolving the US problems in Iraq and the dispute with Iran, a practical solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will be necessary.
The fact that Obama’s campaign is free of right-wing Christians or pro-Israel lobbyists bodes well for many hoping that his presidency can be more balanced to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Contrasted with the quickly fading promises of George Bush for a peace treaty in 2008, Obama’s candidacy is welcomed.
* Published in the JORDAN TIMES on April 14, 2008. Daoud Kuttab is a Palestinian columnist and a Ferris journalism professor. |
