Last Updated: Mon Feb 20, 2012 09:53 am (KSA) 06:53 am (GMT)

Top U.S. general: intervention in Syria ‘very difficult,’ strike against Iran ‘premature’

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, has said that his country is hesitant to intervene in the Syrian crisis at this point. (Reuters)
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, has said that his country is hesitant to intervene in the Syrian crisis at this point. (Reuters)

The top U.S. military officer warned Sunday that intervention in Syria would be “very difficult” and said it that a military strike against Iran would be premature, because it is unclear whether Tehran will actually use its nuclear capabilities to build an atomic bomb.

General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS” that Syria was the focus of competing Middle Eastern states, notably Iran and Saudi Arabia, and posed different problems for the United States than Libya did.

“It’s premature to take a decision to arm the opposition movement in Syria because I would challenge anyone to identify for me the opposition movement in Syria at this point,” Dempsey said in an interview.

“There’s indications that al-Qaeda is involved and that they’re interested in supporting the opposition. I mean there’s a number of players, all of whom are trying to reinforce their particular side of this issue.

“And until we’re a lot clearer about, you know, who they are and what they are, I think it would be premature to talk about arming them.”

Dempsey identified “a Sunni-Shiite competition for, you know, regional control,” of Syria being played out between Saudi Arabia and Iran as a key barrier to U.S. intervention, as well as Damascus’s “very capable,” military.

“They have a very sophisticated, integrated air defense system. They have chemical and biological weapons. They haven’t demonstrated any interest or any intent to use those, but it is a very different military problem,” Dempsey said, noting he had not yet been asked to provide U.S. military options on Syria.

“Intervening in Syria would be very difficult... And I think that the current path of trying to gain some kind of international consensus is the proper path, rather than to take a decision to do anything unilaterally.”

“But, you know, I wear the uniform I wear to provide options when asked. And we’ll be prepared to do that. But this would not be - it was a big mistake to think of this as another Libya,” he added.

“Rational actor”

Regarding Iran, Dempsey said he believed the Iranian government was a “rational actor.” Therefore, it was best for the United States and its allies to stick with international sanctions and diplomacy to try to convince Tehran not to weaponize its nuclear program.”

“I believe it is unclear (that Iran would assemble a bomb) and on that basis, I think it would be premature to exclusively decide that the time for a military option was upon us,” Dempsey said.

He said he was confident Israel knew that this was the general U.S. attitude, but he stopped short of suggesting that the Americans had persuaded the Israelis that it was best not to attack Iran.

“I’m confident that they (Israel) understand our concerns that a strike at this time would be destabilizing and wouldn’t achieve their long-term objectives,” he said.

“I wouldn’t suggest, sitting here today, that we’ve persuaded them that our view is the correct view ...” Dempsey added.

Iranian leaders have responded sharply to speculation that Israel could bomb Iran within months to stop it from assembling nuclear weapons, threatening to retaliate against any country that launches an attack against the Islamic Republic.
Israel, which is widely believed to have the only nuclear arsenal in the Middle East, says a nuclear-armed Iran would threaten its existence. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

But Iran’s recent shift of uranium enrichment to a mountain bunker - possibly impervious to conventional bombing - and refusal to negotiate peaceful guarantees for the nuclear program have raised fears about Iran’s ambitions as well as concerns about Gulf oil supplies.

However, U.S. and European officials on Friday voiced cautious optimism over the latest signals from Tehran that it might be willing to resume talks with major powers on the nuclear issue, after the Iranians sent them a letter.

The United States also has not ruled out the use of military force to stop Iran getting a bomb. Dempsey said the U.S. military had to have options available “should the nation decide to do something in Iran”.

“I mean, fundamentally, we have to be prepared,” he said. “And that includes, for the most part, at this point, being prepared defensively.”

Dempsey discussed Iran with Israeli leaders during a visit there last month. His interview was aired on CNN as President Barack Obama’s national security adviser, Tom Donilon, was on a visit to Israel for talks on regional issues including Syria and Iran.

Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, said on Thursday U.S. agencies believed Israel had not yet taken a decision to launch a full-scale military strike on Iranian nuclear sites.

Comments »

Post Your Comment »

Social Media »